Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic note
Alopecoenas kubaryi (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) was previously placed in the genus Gallicolumba.
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
low |
Land-mass type |
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: On Pohnpei, the population was estimated at 841 birds in 1983-1984 (Engbring et al. 1990). In 1994, a repeat survey recorded a 67% decrease in encounter rate in the lowlands, but no change in the uplands, which equated to a 50% reduction overall (Buden 2000). Therefore, the population size in 1994 is inferred to have been 421 individuals, and assuming the decline continued at the same rate, the population size on Pohnpei in 2020 may be no more than 76 individuals. In 2012, a survey was carried out at 247 stations on 19 transects across Pohnpei and only five individuals were recorded (Oleiro 2014), suggesting that the species is extremely rare on Pohnpei (R. Davis in litt. 2020).
In Chuuk (Truk), the population was estimated to number 294 in 1983-1984 (Engbring et al. 1990). A Chuuk population estimate in 2001 indicated a significantly smaller population (G. Dutson in litt. 2001), although six individuals were seen during a drive along approximately five miles of the coast road on Weno in 2019 (C. Collins in litt. 2020). The species appears to be seen more regularly in Chuuk (C. Collins in litt. 2020, R. Davis in litt. 2020), so it may be declining more slowly there. Assuming that the population declined by 10% between 1983-1984 and 2001, and that the trends continued, the population size today may be in the region of 236 individuals.
Based on the population estimates for Pohnpei and Chuuk from 1983-1984 (Engbring et al. 1990), and subsequent surveys that indicated population declines (F. Amidon in litt. 2007, Buden 2000, Oleiro 2014, G. Dutson in litt. 2001), the total population size is estimated to number 312-715 individuals, roughly equating to 208-477 mature individuals, here rounded to 200-500 mature individuals.
The species is likely to have at least two subpopulations. The largest was previously found in Pohnpei (Engbring et al. 1990), but following declines there, the population in Chuuk may now be larger. Based on the population estimate for Chuuk from 1983-1984 (Engbring et al. 1990), and subsequent surveys that indicated population declines (G. Dutson in litt. 2001), and extrapolating to 2020, the current population size in Chuuk is estimated to be within the range 236-294 individuals, roughly equating to 157-196 mature individuals, here rounded to 150-200 mature individuals.
Trend justification: The population size has probably always been low, at least in historical times (Baker 1951, Engbring et al. 1990).
On Pohnpei, the population was estimated at 841 birds in 1983-1984 (Engbring et al. 1990). In 1994, a repeat survey recorded a 67% decrease in encounter rate in the lowlands, but no change in the uplands, which equated to a 50% reduction overall (Buden 2000). This would equate to a reduction of 69% if it continued at the same rate over three generations (17.7 years), assuming exponential decline. In 2012, a survey carried out at 247 stations on 19 transects across Pohnpei did not detect the species, but five individuals were recorded outside surveys (Oleiro 2014), suggesting that the population on Pohnpei was extremely small.
In Chuuk (Truk) it was estimated to number 294 in 1983-1984 (Engbring et al. 1990). A population estimate in 2001 indicated a significantly smaller population (G. Dutson in litt. 2001). The species appears to be seen more regularly in Chuuk (C. Collins in litt. 2020, R. Davis in litt. 2020), so it may be declining more slowly there.
Based on the results of surveys in both Pohnpei and Chuuk, a continuing decline is inferred. Overall, the population is suspected to have undergone a reduction of 30-49% over the past three generations (17.7 years). Assuming current trends continue, the species is suspected to decline at a similar rate over the next three generations.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Caroline Islands Ground Dove Pampusana kubaryi. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/caroline-islands-ground-dove-pampusana-kubaryi on 23/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/11/2024.