Current view: Data table and detailed info
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Red List history
Migratory status |
not a migrant |
Forest dependency |
medium |
Land-mass type |
continent
shelf island
|
Average mass |
- |
Population justification: Approximately 6,300 km2 of habitat remained in Myanmar in 2016 (De Alban et al. 2020), reduced here (in 2022) to c.5,400 km2, assuming a continuing linear reduction in habitat extent at the rate estimated by De Alban et al. (2020) to have occurred between 2007 and 2016. In the Sundarbans, c.10,000 km2 of suitable habitat likely remains, with approximately 3,500 km2 in Thailand and Malaysia (Global Forest Watch 2022, using data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). A total of c.19,000 km2 of habitat is therefore assumed to be suitable for this species. In the Sundarbans and the Myeik Archipelago, Myanmar, Reza et al. (2003) and Zöckler (2016) respectively both estimated densities of 2.6 mature individuals/km2. Assuming a high rate of habitat occupancy (50-70%) to reflect its qualitative descriptions as common (Smythies 1986, Chowdhury et al. 2020, Grimmett et al. 2021), the population is therefore estimated at 25,000-35,000 mature individuals.
Trend justification: The trend of this species varies across its range, but habitat loss is known to have caused local extirpations (Smythies 1986, eBird 2022).
In the Sundarbans (India and Bangladesh) there is limited anecdotal evidence that it may be declining although this has not been quantified (S. Chowdhury pers. comm. 2022). The total area of suitable habitat in the Sundarbans, Thailand and Malaysia has reduced only moderately over the past three generations, equivalent to approximately 5% (Global Forest Watch 2022, using data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). In Myanmar however, between 2007 and 2016 the extent of mangroves declined 3.87% per annum (De Alban et al. 2020), a rate equivalent to 55% over three generations. In 2007, Myanmar probably held c.45% of the global population of Brown-winged Kingfishers, thus mangrove loss in this country alone has likely caused a global population size reduction of c.25% over the past three generations. Accounting for uncertainties, especially trends in other countries in its range, the population reduction over the past three generations is therefore set at 20-29%. However, the Burmese population accounts for an increasingly small percentage of the global population and habitat protections elsewhere (especially in the Sundarbans) are comparatively robust. The rate of reduction in the future is therefore unknown, but is thought unlikely to exceed 20%.
Country/territory distribution
Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Brown-winged Kingfisher Pelargopsis amauroptera. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/brown-winged-kingfisher-pelargopsis-amauroptera on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.