Taxonomic source(s)
Christidis, L. and Boles, W.E. 2008. Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
A2bcd+4bcd | A2bcd+4bcd | A2bcd+4bcd |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Vulnerable | A2bcd+4bcd |
2016 | Least Concern | |
2012 | Least Concern | |
2009 | Least Concern | |
2008 | Least Concern | |
2004 | Least Concern | |
2000 | Lower Risk/Least Concern | |
1994 | Lower Risk/Least Concern | |
1988 | Lower Risk/Least Concern |
Migratory status | full migrant | Forest dependency | medium |
Land-mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 5,160,000 km2 | |
Extent of Occurrence (non-breeding) | 17,400,000 km2 | |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | unknown | - | - | - |
Population trend | decreasing | - | inferred | 2011-2023 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-90,30-49% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-90,30-49% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 4.08 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 100% | - | - | - |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified, but the species is reported to be locally frequent and common to uncommon (del Hoyo et al. 2001). Given its extensive range and reports that the species is locally common, the population size is not thought to approach 10,000 individuals.
Trend justification:
Data from South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore indicate this species has declined rapidly over the past three generations (12.3 years; Bird et al. 2020), while data from India indicate it may be declining there too.
Modelling the broad-scale occupancy trends between 1997-2005 and 2013-2019 using South Korean national bird survey data revealed a 95% decline, equating to 91% over three generations (Kim et al. 2021). Atlases of Hong Kong avifauna show that in the breeding season, the number of grids where the species was encountered dropped from 2.4% to 0.1% from 1993-1996 to 2016-2019. In the winter, they dropped from 2.4% to 0.2% from 2001-2005 to 2016-2019 (HKBWS 2020). This is equivalent to breeding season and winter occupancy rates decreasing by 82% and 87% respectively within three generations. However, it is unclear whether the causes of these reductions are globally applicable, with Hong Kong becoming substantially more forested (with less suitable habitat for this species) over the past three generations, which is not true of elsewhere in its range. In Singapore, based on count data over 26 years, the population is estimated to have declined at an equivalent rate of c.50% over three generations (Yong D.L. in litt. 2022).
Data from India are unclear. The modelled reporting rate in 2014/2015 relative to before 2000 is reported to be 85% lower, although the citizen science data used (eBird) are spatially and temporally variable, the confidence intervals of the outputs are broad, and the rate of decline is considered non-significant (SoIB 2020). The reporting rate over the five-year span from 2014/15 to 2018/19 is also uncertain, with no significant change apparent (SoIB 2020).
Given the variability of the above trends which provide insight into only a small proportion of the entire range, the population-wide decline over the past three generations is suspected to be greater than 30%, but may be considerably higher. The rate of future decline is not estimated here given the uncertainties of the principal acting threat.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bangladesh | extant | native | yes | |||
Brunei | extant | native | yes | |||
Cambodia | extant | native | yes | |||
China (mainland) | extant | native | yes | |||
Hong Kong (China) | extant | native | yes | |||
India | extant | native | yes | |||
Indonesia | extant | vagrant | ||||
Japan | extant | vagrant | ||||
Laos | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Malaysia | extant | native | yes | |||
Myanmar | extant | native | yes | yes | ||
Nepal | extant | vagrant | ||||
North Korea | extant | native | yes | |||
Pakistan | extant | vagrant | ||||
Philippines | extant | native | yes | |||
Russia | extant | vagrant | ||||
Russia (Asian) | extant | vagrant | ||||
Singapore | extant | native | yes | |||
South Korea | extant | native | yes | |||
Sri Lanka | extant | vagrant | ||||
Taiwan, China | extant | vagrant | ||||
Thailand | extant | native | yes | |||
Vietnam | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable Land | suitable | non-breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable Land | suitable | breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Plantations | suitable | non-breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Plantations | suitable | breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rural Gardens | suitable | non-breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Rural Gardens | suitable | breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Urban Areas | suitable | breeding |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Urban Areas | suitable | non-breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Dry | suitable | non-breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Dry | suitable | breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level | major | non-breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level | major | breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | suitable | non-breeding |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | suitable | breeding |
Forest | Temperate | major | breeding |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | Coastal Brackish/Saline Lagoons/Marine Lakes | suitable | non-breeding |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | Coastal Brackish/Saline Lagoons/Marine Lakes | suitable | breeding |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | Coastal Freshwater Lakes | suitable | non-breeding |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | Coastal Freshwater Lakes | suitable | breeding |
Marine Intertidal | Rocky Shoreline | suitable | non-breeding |
Marine Intertidal | Rocky Shoreline | suitable | breeding |
Marine Neritic | Estuaries | suitable | non-breeding |
Marine Neritic | Estuaries | suitable | breeding |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha) | suitable | non-breeding |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha) | suitable | breeding |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls) | suitable | non-breeding |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls) | suitable | breeding |
Altitude | 0 - 1525 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Unintentional effects (species is not the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Natural system modifications | Other ecosystem modifications | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Rapid Declines | Medium Impact: 7 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Food - human | subsistence, national |
Pets/display animals, horticulture | subsistence, national |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Black-capped Kingfisher Halcyon pileata. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/black-capped-kingfisher-halcyon-pileata on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.