Taxonomic note
Edolisoma mindanense (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) was previously listed as Coracina mindanensis.
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | A2c+3c+4c |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2024 | Vulnerable | A2c+3c+4c |
2016 | Vulnerable | A2c+3c+4c |
2012 | Vulnerable | A2c+3c+4c |
2008 | Vulnerable | A2c; A3c; A4c |
2004 | Vulnerable | |
2000 | Lower Risk/Near Threatened | |
1996 | Vulnerable | |
1994 | Vulnerable | |
1988 | Lower Risk/Least Concern |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | medium |
Land-mass type |
shelf island |
Average mass | 59 g |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 750,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | unknown | - | - | - |
Population trend | decreasing | poor | suspected | 2016-2028 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-39% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-39% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 20-39% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 4.1 years | - | - | - |
Population justification: Population size not estimated, but abundance and density evidently varies across its relatively large range. Described as scarce by Allen (2020) and pattern of records eBird 2024) generally suggest that it is commoner in southern parts of its range. Interpretations of its abundance are also obfuscated by the species' generally elusive ecology, with Allen (2020) concluding that it 'may be more widespread than records suggest'.
Trend justification: No monitoring data from which to derive trends, but assumed to be declining moderately rapidly in response to forest cover loss within its range. This species is confined to lowland forest and second growth, much of which has been cleared in the Philippines. Records remain from a scattering of localities (mostly in Mindanao) but it is evidently absent from a range of sites which might otherwise be expected to host it. Within its elevational range, forest cover loss was c.20% in the three generations (12.3 years) to 2023 (Global Forest Watch 2024, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods therein) but this possibly underestimates the rate of decline in this species. First, it does not take into account selective logging and degradation which is widespread in the Philippines (Grantham et al. 2020). Second, it appears to overestimate the area of existing habitat (confusing some plantations and heavily degraded forests for forest cover), thus underestimated the percentage of decline in habitat. Moreover, sites from where most records of this species come (e.g. PICOP, Brgy Kuden and Samar Natural Park) are being cleared and degraded very rapidly, while sites such as Subic Bay (Luzon) appear to show a declining reporting rate, despite little to no change in forest extent. Overall, it is therefore considered possible that this species may be declining relatively rapidly, equivalent to 20-39% over the past three generations, with similar rates suspected in the future.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Philippines | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest | marginal | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane | suitable | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 1000 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Rapid Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Agro-industry plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Energy production & mining | Mining & quarrying | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Black-bibbed Cicadabird Edolisoma mindanense. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/black-bibbed-cicadabird-edolisoma-mindanense on 19/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 19/12/2024.