NT
Black-backed Dwarf-kingfisher Ceyx erithaca



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note
Ceyx erithaca and C. rufidorsa (Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International 2023) were previously lumped as C. erithaca (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) despite being previously split following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993). Lim et al. (2010) make a convincing case for species-level genetic differentiation and suggest that intergrades have resulted from past introgression rather than ongoing gene flow. Confounding factors include the facts that C. erithaca is a partial migrant and that the Bornean population motleyi appears intermediate in plumage, but genetically belongs with rufidorsa. See C. rufidorsa for differences. Closely related to C. rufidorsa, C. melanurus and C. mindanensis; molecular data indicate that they form a well-supported clade with C. lepidus, C. cyanopectus and C. argentatus (and taxa previously included within those species) (Moyle et al. 2007). Original specific name erithaca is a noun, and therefore remains unchanged, irrespective of gender of genus in which placed (David and Gosselin 2002). Two subspecies currently recognized.

Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2023. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 8. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v8_Dec23.zip.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2023 Near Threatened A2c+3c+4c
2016 Not Recognised
2014 Not Recognised
2012 Least Concern
2009 Least Concern
2008 Least Concern
2004 Least Concern
2000 Lower Risk/Least Concern
1994 Lower Risk/Least Concern
1988 Lower Risk/Least Concern
Species attributes

Migratory status full migrant Forest dependency medium
Land-mass type Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 7,530,000 km2 medium
Extent of Occurrence (non-breeding) 9,370,000 km2 medium
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown - - -
Population trend decreasing - inferred 2016-2026
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 10-29,15-25% - - -
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 10-29,15-25% - - -
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) 10-29,15-25% - - -
Generation length 2.7 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 3 - - -
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation 1-89% - - -

Population justification: The global population has never been formally estimated but throughout its range descriptions of its abundance range from rare to locally common (Limparungpatthanakij and Hansasuta 2022). eBird (2023) data suggest that in South-East Asia it is rather thinly distributed (even accounting for inconsistent observer effort), although in some places this may be a reflection of recent declines rather than a natural scarcity.

Trend justification: The population is inferred to be declining in response to habitat loss and other threats (including collisions structures on migration) which have caused a decrease in population size over the past ten years.
In the last 10 years (2013-2023), forest cover in this species' breeding/resident ranges declined by c.15% (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). This figure does not account for degradation, although C. erithaca is evidently capable of persisting in (sometimes highly) degraded habitats, but most losses in the 15% described amount to total clearance for agriculture, which will have a direct impact on this species. This species is apparently declining at a rate that exceeds forest cover loss alone, with reports of it having disappeared from sites it once formerly occupied (J. Eaton pers. comm. 2023). The mechanisms behind these additive declines, and the rate at which they're occurring, are poorly known. The species is among the most frequently reported species to collide with windows in Singapore (Low et al. 2017) and has been recorded colliding with structures nearly throughout its range (Ali and Ripley 1983, Wells 1999, Round 2008) although the contribution of this threat to suspected declines remains very poorly known. There may also be factors associated with migration that are impacting this species in ways that are not yet known. In particular, potential wintering strongholds of low-lying forest in Peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra may have been converted to palm oil plantations, which this species does not appear able to tolerate. Nonetheless, this is highly speculative, and it is ultimately unknown what percentage of C. erithaca migrate this far south. Precautionarily, over the past ten years, it is suspected of having declined by 10-29%, with a best estimate at the midpoint, of 15-25%. These suspected rates require empirical confirmation but in the absence of clear amelioration of these threats going forward, are precautionarily suspected to occur in the future.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
Bangladesh extant native yes yes
Bhutan extant native yes
Cambodia extant native yes yes
China (mainland) extant native yes yes
India extant native yes yes yes
Indonesia extant native yes yes
Laos extant native yes yes
Malaysia extant native yes
Myanmar extant native yes yes yes
Singapore extant native yes yes
Sri Lanka extant native yes
Thailand extant native yes yes yes
Vietnam extant native yes yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Artificial/Terrestrial Plantations suitable non-breeding
Artificial/Terrestrial Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest marginal non-breeding
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Dry major resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level marginal resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Swamp suitable resident
Altitude 0 - 600 m Occasional altitudinal limits (max) 1300 m

Threats & impact
Threat (level 1) Threat (level 2) Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Shifting agriculture Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Negligible declines Low Impact: 4
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Wood & pulp plantations - Agro-industry plantations Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Slow, Significant Declines Low Impact: 5
Stresses
Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Residential & commercial development Commercial & industrial areas Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Species mortality
Residential & commercial development Housing & urban areas Timing Scope Severity Impact
Ongoing Minority (<50%) Unknown Unknown
Stresses
Species mortality

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Black-backed Dwarf-kingfisher Ceyx erithaca. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/black-backed-dwarf-kingfisher-ceyx-erithaca on 22/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 22/12/2024.