Taxonomic note
Pyrrhura picta, P. snethlageae, P. parvifrons, P. amazonum, P. lucianii, P. roseifrons, P. peruviana, P. subandina, P. caeruleiceps and P. eisenmanni (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as P. picta following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | D1 |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Vulnerable | D1 |
2016 | Endangered | C2a(ii) |
2014 | Endangered | C2a(ii) |
2012 | Not Recognised | |
2008 | Not Recognised | |
2004 | Not Recognised | |
2000 | Not Recognised | |
1994 | Not Recognised | |
1988 | Not Recognised |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | medium |
Land-mass type | Average mass | 62 g |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 1,800 km2 | medium |
Area of Occupancy (breeding/resident) | 1,780 km2 | |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 750-6000 mature individuals | poor | estimated | 2021 |
Population trend | decreasing | - | suspected | 2016-2026 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 2.8 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 100% | - | - | - |
Population justification: The species is described as locally common up to 1,660 m in its very small range (Juniper and Parr 1998, Forshaw 2006, MontaƱez and Angehr 2007, Forshaw 2010). Assuming that Pyrrhura eisenmanni occurs at the same density as P. picta (with which it was considered conspecific until 2014), i.e. 1-8 mature individuals per km2 (Santini et al. 2018), and that 50% of the range is occupied, the global population is estimated at 750-6,000 mature individuals.
Trend justification: The species is suspected to be in slow decline owing to habitat loss and fragmentation. Additionally, there may be low pressure from trapping for trade, but it is unclear how this is impacting the population size. Tree cover loss within the range is currently estimated at 3% across ten years (Global Forest Watch 2021, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein); however, large parts of the range are thought to be secure in Cerro Hoyo National Park (Collar et al. 2020). Assuming that forest loss is continuing at this rate and that population declines are roughly equivalent to the rate of forest loss, the species may be declining at <10% over ten years.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Panama | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane | suitable | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Swamp | suitable | resident |
Savanna | Dry | suitable | resident |
Altitude | 100 - 2000 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Unknown | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Causing/Could cause fluctuations | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Pets/display animals, horticulture | subsistence, national |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Azuero Parakeet Pyrrhura eisenmanni. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/azuero-parakeet-pyrrhura-eisenmanni on 28/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 28/11/2024.