LC
Annamite Limestone-babbler Gypsophila annamensis



Taxonomy

Taxonomic note
Previously lumped with G. crispifrons (Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International 2021) but despite minimal plumage differences (annamensis being slightly greyer), now split on the basis of deep genetic divergence and vocal differences (Gwee et al. 2021). Monotypic.

Taxonomic source(s)
Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International. 2023. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 8. Available at: https://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v8_Dec23.zip.

IUCN Red List criteria met and history
Red List criteria met
Critically Endangered Endangered Vulnerable
- - -

Red List history
Year Category Criteria
2023 Least Concern
2016 Not Recognised
2012 Not Recognised
2008 Not Recognised
2004 Not Recognised
2000 Not Recognised
1994 Not Recognised
1988 Not Recognised
Species attributes

Migratory status not a migrant Forest dependency medium
Land-mass type Average mass -
Range

Estimate Data quality
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) 370,000 km2
Severely fragmented? no -
Population
Estimate Data quality Derivation Year of estimate
Population size unknown - - -
Population trend stable - inferred -
Generation length 3.86 years - - -
Number of subpopulations 1-30 - - -

Population justification: The population size of this species has not been quantified, although it occurs over a relatively wide area in a habitat where it can be found in relatively high densities with little competition (eBird 2023). In Thailand, Treesucon and Limparungpatthanakij (2018) described as 'locally common' a species concept that combines G. crispifrons sensu stricto and G. annamensis. In Vietnam, described as 'locally fairly common' (Craik and LĂȘ 2018). Thus while the population size is not estimated here, it is considered unlikely to be especially small.

Trend justification: No repeat surveys have been undertaken of this species from which to estimate directly its population trend. However, using habitat extent as a proxy, it is inferred to be stable in the absence of other plausible threats. Remote sensing data indicate only minimal habitat loss in its range, amounting to less than 2% loss over the past three generations (11.6 years: 2011-2023) (Global Forest Watch 2023, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein). Although this value does not account for habitat degradation, this species is evidently adaptable to some degradation, and occurs at sites that have been heavily modified and are fragmented (eBird 2023). In the absence of any data to the contrary, there is no evidence that this species has declined over the past three generations and its dependence on rugged limestone karsts is likely to protect it from future declines.


Country/territory distribution
Country/Territory Presence Origin Resident Breeding visitor Non-breeding visitor Passage migrant
China (mainland) extant native yes
Laos extant native yes
Thailand extant native yes
Vietnam extant native yes

Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBA)
Country/Territory IBA Name

Habitats & altitude
Habitat (level 1) Habitat (level 2) Importance Occurrence
Artificial/Terrestrial Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest suitable resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland major resident
Forest Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane suitable resident
Shrubland Subtropical/Tropical Moist suitable resident
Altitude 0 - 900 m Occasional altitudinal limits  

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Annamite Limestone-babbler Gypsophila annamensis. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/annamite-limestone-babbler-gypsophila-annamensis on 26/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 26/12/2024.