Taxonomic note
Anas gibberifrons and A. albogularis (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as A. gibberifrons following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2024 | Near Threatened | D1 |
2016 | Vulnerable | D1 |
2014 | Vulnerable | D1 |
2012 | Not Recognised | |
2008 | Not Recognised | |
2004 | Not Recognised | |
2000 | Not Recognised | |
1994 | Not Recognised | |
1988 | Not Recognised |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | does not normally occur in forest |
Land-mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 16,400 km2 | |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 1000-2500 mature individuals | poor | estimated | 2023 |
Population trend | stable | - | suspected | - |
Generation length | 5.02 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 100% | - | - | - |
Population justification: Has generally been estimated to number fewer than 1,000 mature individuals, although determining the accuracy of these counts is difficult owing to fluctuating numbers at sites and the lack of a coordinated effort across the entire species' range. A study on the species 1995-1998 yielded an estimate of 500-600 (Vijayan et al. 2000) and this was also supported during a study in 2003-2004 (Vijayan 2006). However, in more recent years counts exceeding 800 individuals at single counts have been made around Ograbraj and Sippighat (eBird 2023). The degree to which numbers at these sites are independent is unknown, but it seems likely that South Andaman alone supports more than 1,000 birds (eBird 2023, Praveen J in litt. 2024), while records have also come from recent years from North Andaman, Havelock Island, and Little Andaman, suggesting that the species is relatively widespread, even if not abundant away from its strongholds. While not all individuals counted will be mature, it is now considered probable that the number of mature individuals probably exceeds 1,000, although it may not be substantially higher. The population is therefore estimated at 1,000-2,500 mature individuals.
Trend justification: The population is suspected to be stable in the absence of evidence for any declines or substantial threats, and counts seem to indicate that it is stable or increasing, with some inter-annual fluctuations (eBird 2023).
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Mangrove Vegetation Above High Tide Level | suitable | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands | suitable | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools (under 8ha) | major | resident |
Wetlands (inland) | Permanent Rivers/Streams/Creeks (includes waterfalls) | major | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 250 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biological resource use | Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Human intrusions & disturbance | Work & other activities | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Roads & railroads | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 4 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Food - human | subsistence, national |
Pets/display animals, horticulture | international |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Andaman Teal Anas albogularis. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/andaman-teal-anas-albogularis on 27/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 27/12/2024.