The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 100–150 pairs | A3 |
Tibetan Snowcock Tetraogallus tibetanus | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 25–50 pairs | A3 |
Bar-headed Goose Anser indicus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 60–125 pairs | A3 |
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | LC | passage (2000–2006) | 200–3,500 birds | A4i |
Charadrius mongolus | NR | breeding (2000–2006) | 40–60 pairs | A3 |
Brown-headed Gull Larus brunnicephalus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 20–30 pairs | A3 |
Himalayan Griffon Gyps himalayensis | NT | resident (2000–2006) | 8–10 pairs | A3 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | passage (2000–2006) | 4 birds | A1 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 15–18 pairs | A3 |
Hume's Lark Calandrella acutirostris | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 200–250 pairs | A3 |
White-winged Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 3–4 pairs | A3 |
Altai Accentor Prunella himalayana | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 2–3 pairs | A3 |
Brown Accentor Prunella fulvescens | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 10–12 pairs | A3 |
White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 20–30 pairs | A3 |
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 25–30 pairs | A3 |
Red-fronted Rosefinch Carpodacus puniceus | LC | breeding (2000–2006) | 30–40 pairs | A3 |
Brandt's Mountain-finch Leucosticte brandti | LC | resident (2000–2006) | 750–1,000 pairs | A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | not assessed | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1972 | Зоркуль | Заповедник (Ia) | 15 |
2000 | Zorkul | National Nature Reserve (Ia) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 27 | |
Desert | 25 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 25 | |
Grassland | 23 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
agriculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Zorkul Nature Reserve (Lake Victoria) (Tajikistan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/zorkul-nature-reserve-(lake-victoria)-iba-tajikistan on 22/12/2024.