The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | passage | 2007 | 1,500-2,500 individuals | A4i |
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis | VU | passage | 2007 | 200-300 individuals | A1 |
Greylag Goose Anser anser | LC | passage | 2007 | 6,000-15,000 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2007 | 20,000-40,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | near favourable | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Forest | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 50 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 40 | |
Forest | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
agriculture | 50 |
rangeland/pastureland | 50 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Zhylandy Lake (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/zhylandy-lake-iba-kazakhstan on 23/11/2024.