The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | EN | passage | 2004 | 48 individuals | A1 |
Greylag Goose Anser anser | LC | passage | 2004 | 215,000 individuals | A4i |
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage | 2004 | 85,000 individuals | A4i |
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus | VU | passage | 2004 | 13 individuals | A1 |
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula | LC | passage | 2004 | 660 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2004 | 309,030 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | very unfavourable | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | very poor (< 40%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation | 80 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Highly improved reseeded grasslands | 10 |
Grassland | Dry grassland on sandy soils, Mesophile grassland & tall grass steppe, Steppes & dry calcareous | 10 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 100 |
rangeland/pastureland | 20 |
agriculture | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Zharkol Lakes (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/zharkol-lakes-iba-kazakhstan on 22/11/2024.