The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spotted Imperial-pigeon Ducula carola | VU | resident | 1992 | present | A1 |
Flame-breasted Fruit-dove Ramphiculus marchei | VU | resident | 1992 | present | A1, A2 |
Furtive Flycatcher Ficedula disposita | LC | resident | 1992 | present | A2 |
Green-faced Parrotfinch Erythrura viridifacies | VU | resident | 1992 | present | A1, A2 |
White-cheeked Bullfinch Pyrrhula leucogenis | LC | resident | 1992 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | very unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | Manleluag Spring | Protected Landscape | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Zambales mountains (Philippines). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/zambales-mountains-iba-philippines on 22/11/2024.