The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | favourable | medium | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Agricultural Land | Designation Not Known | 5 |
1931 | Addo-Elephant National Park | National Park | - |
1984 | Woody Cape Nature Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | 9 |
1985 | Bosch Hoek Nature Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | 1 |
1985 | Boxwood Nature Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | 1 |
1985 | Congas Kraal Nature Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed | - |
Grassland | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 7 |
tourism/recreation | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Woody Cape Section: Addo Elephant National Park (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/woody-cape-section:-addo-elephant-national-park-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.