The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Short-tailed Shearwater Ardenna tenuirostris | LC | resident | 1978-1995 | 1,430,551 nests | A4ii |
Pacific Gull Larus pacificus | LC | resident | - | 456 breeding pairs | A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | very poor (< 40%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1991 | Seal Islands W.R. | Nature Conservation Reserve | 2 |
1992 | Wilsons Promontory Islands | Remote and Natural Area - Schedule 6, National Parks Act | 68 |
1992 | Seal Islands R.N.A | Remote and Natural Area - not scheduled under NPA | 5 |
1995 | Wilsons Promontory National Park | National Park | 69 |
1996 | Anser Island | Reference Area | 12 |
1999 | Rodondo Island | Nature Reserve | 12 |
1999 | West Moncoeur Island | Nature Reserve | 2 |
2011 | East Moncoeur Island | Conservation Area | 2 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 10 | |
Grassland | Tussock grasslands | major (>10) |
Shrubland | Other shrublands | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
not utilised | minor (<10) |
urban/industrial/transport | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Wilsons Promontory Islands (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/wilsons-promontory-islands-iba-australia on 22/11/2024.