The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Short-tailed Shearwater Ardenna tenuirostris | LC | resident (1978–1995) | 1,430,551 nests | A4ii |
Pacific Gull Larus pacificus | LC | resident (-) | 456 pairs | A4i |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very poor | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Shrubland | very poor (<40%) | very poor (<40%) | very poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | likely in short term (<4 years) | whole of population/area (>90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (<4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (<4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | likely in short term (<4 years) | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1991 | Seal Islands W.R. | Nature Conservation Reserve (Ia) | 2 |
1992 | Wilsons Promontory Islands | Remote and Natural Area - Schedule 6, National Parks Act (II) | 68 |
1992 | Seal Islands R.N.A | Remote and Natural Area - not scheduled under NPA (Ia) | 5 |
1995 | Wilsons Promontory National Park | National Park (II) | 69 |
1996 | Anser Island | Reference Area (Ia) | 12 |
1999 | Rodondo Island | Nature Reserve (Ia) | 12 |
1999 | West Moncoeur Island | Nature Reserve (Ia) | 2 |
2011 | East Moncoeur Island | Conservation Area (V) | 2 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | 10 | |
Grassland | major (>10) | Tussock grasslands |
Shrubland | minor (<10) | Other shrublands |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
not utilised | minor (<10) |
urban/industrial/transport | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Wilsons Promontory Islands (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/wilsons-promontory-islands-iba-australia on 23/12/2024.