The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 1996 | 10-25 breeding pairs | A1, B2, C1, C6 |
Little Gull Hydrocoloeus minutus | LC | breeding | 1991 | 40 breeding pairs | B2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | very unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Corncrake Crex crex | 20 | 20 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Little Gull Hydrocoloeus minutus | 40 | 0 | breeding pairs | 0 | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1996 | Värtsilän laakson luontokokonaisuus | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 25 |
1998 | Värtsilän laakso (SPA) | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 62 |
1998 | UUDENKYLÄNLAMMEN LUONNONSUOJELUALUE | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | <1 |
2006 | Sääperin luonnonsuojelualue 2 | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 11 |
2006 | Sääperin ja Uudenkylänlammen luonnonsuojelualue | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 6 |
2006 | Sääperin luonnonsuojelualue 1 | Yksityinen luonnonsuojelualue | 5 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 55 | |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater | 40 |
Forest | Mixed woodland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 40 |
agriculture | 30 |
unknown | 25 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Värtsilä valley (Finland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/värtsilä-valley-iba-finland on 22/11/2024.