The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | not assessed | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Vago | Reserved Forest | 1 |
1930 | Savura Forest | Reserved Forest | 1 |
1952 | Savura Forest Reserve | Forest Reserve | <1 |
1986 | Garrick Memorial park | Forest Park | 1 |
1997 | Rivers Fiji (Upper Navua) | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Upper montane rain forest (tropical) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Viti Levu Southern Highlands (Fiji). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/viti-levu-southern-highlands-iba-fiji on 22/11/2024.