The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula | LC | winter | 2004-2009 | 1,500-22,700 individuals | C3 |
Goosander Mergus merganser | LC | winter | 2004-2009 | 400-6,500 individuals | C3 |
Horned Grebe Podiceps auritus | VU | passage | 2004-2009 | 10-300 individuals | C2 |
Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata | NT | passage | 2007-2009 | 100 individuals | C1 |
Little Gull Hydrocoloeus minutus | LC | passage | 2007-2009 | 1,500-5,000 individuals | C2 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | breeding | 2007-2009 | 40-50 breeding pairs | C6 |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | breeding | 2007-2009 | 300-360 breeding pairs | C6 |
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis | LC | passage | 2007-2009 | 2,000 individuals | C2 |
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis | LC | breeding | 2007-2009 | 300-570 breeding pairs | C2, C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter | 2004-2009 | 31,700 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | very unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | 45 | 15 | breeding pairs | 34 | very unfavourable |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | 160 | 50 | breeding pairs | 32 | very unfavourable |
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis | 190 | 100 | breeding pairs | 53 | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
No known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Vistula river mouth | Baltic Sea Protected Area (Helcom) | 100 |
1985 | Środkowożuławski | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 19 |
1991 | Mewia Łacha | Rezerwat Przyrody | 23 |
1991 | Mewia Lacha (acha) | Nature Reserve | - |
1994 | Wyspy Sobieszewskiej | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 11 |
1994 | Żuław Gdańskich | Obszar Chronionego Krajobrazu | 5 |
2004 | Ujście Wisły | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2004 | Ostoja w Ujściu Wisły | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 69 |
2009 | Ujscie Wisly | Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) | 98 |
2015 | Vistula River Mouth | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 98 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands | 25 |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest | 10 |
Shrubland | Scrub | 5 |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | 50 |
nature conservation and research | 35 |
forestry | 5 |
tourism/recreation | 5 |
agriculture | 5 |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Vistula river mouth (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/vistula-river-mouth-iba-poland on 22/11/2024.