The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | LC | breeding | 2000 | 3-5 breeding pairs | C6 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | breeding | 2000 | 3 breeding pairs | C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus | 12 | 6 | breeding pairs | 50 | unfavourable |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | 3 | 0 | breeding pairs | 0 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | good (> 90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | Visbarų žuvininkystės tvenkiniai | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2005 | Visbaru biosferos poligonas | Biosferos poligonas | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | 43 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Perennial crops, orchards and groves | 38 |
Grassland | 16 | |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland | 3 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 38 |
rangeland/pastureland | 16 |
fisheries/aquaculture | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Visbarai fish-farm (Lithuania). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/visbarai-fish-farm-iba-lithuania on 23/11/2024.