ZA082
Verlorenvlei Estuary


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
South African Shelduck Tadorna cana LC non-breeding - 288-470 individuals A4i
Cape Shoveler Spatula smithii LC non-breeding - 103-600 individuals A4i
Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus LC resident - 5-20 breeding pairs A4i
Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus LC non-breeding - 87-123 individuals A4i
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta LC non-breeding - 78-452 individuals A4i
Hartlaub's Gull Larus hartlaubii LC non-breeding - 209-377 individuals A4i

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2012 very unfavourable high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca 2,014 2,014 individuals 100 favourable
South African Shelduck Tadorna cana 470 489 individuals 100 favourable
Cape Shoveler Spatula smithii 600 615 individuals 100 favourable
Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus 123 140 individuals 100 favourable
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus 478 478 individuals 100 favourable
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta 452 1,256 individuals 100 favourable
Hartlaub's Gull Larus hartlaubii 377 377 individuals 100 favourable
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia 31 34 individuals 100 favourable
African Marsh-harrier Circus ranivorus 30 9 individuals 30 very unfavourable

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Marine Neritic moderate (70-90%) poor (40-69%) very unfavourable
Marine Coastal/Supratidal moderate (70-90%) poor (40-69%) very unfavourable
Shrubland poor (40-69%) poor (40-69%) very unfavourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Residential and commercial development happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Transportation and service corridors happening now some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Biological resource use happening now some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Human intrusions and disturbance likely in short term (within 4 years) majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Natural system modifications happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Pollution happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Climate change and severe weather happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes likely in short term (within 4 years) some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration medium
Energy production and mining likely in long term (beyond 4 years) some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Some of site covered (10-49%) A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species Some limited conservation initiatives are in place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1991 Verlorenvlei Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance 5

Local Conservation Groups

The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.

Name Year formed
Elands Bay environmental group. 0
For more information on BirdLife's work with Local Conservation Groups, please click here.

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Marine Coastal/Supratidal major (>10)
Shrubland Shrubland - succulent Karroo, Shrubland - Cape (fynbos) major (>10)
Wetlands (inland) Rivers & streams, Permanent herbaceous swamps and bogs minor (<10)
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
agriculture -
tourism/recreation -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Verlorenvlei Estuary (South Africa). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/verlorenvlei-estuary-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.