Varangerfjord (including Hornøya and Reinøya)


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2014 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus VU non-breeding 2008-2013 2-10 individuals B1i
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis VU winter 2008-2013 500-3,000 individuals A1
King Eider Somateria spectabilis LC winter 2008-2013 5,000-8,000 individuals A4i, B1i
Common Eider Somateria mollissima NT winter 2008-2013 6,000-8,000 individuals B1i, B3
Steller's Eider Polysticta stelleri VU winter 2009-2013 2,500-3,500 individuals A1, A4i, B1i, B2
Velvet Scoter Melanitta fusca VU winter 2008-2013 200-400 individuals A1, B2
Red-breasted Merganser Mergus serrator LC non-breeding 2004-2013 1,000-2,000 individuals B1i
Yellow-billed Loon Gavia adamsii NT winter 2008-2014 5-10 individuals A1
Purple Sandpiper Calidris maritima LC winter 2008-2014 500-2,000 individuals B1i, B3
Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla VU breeding 2012-2013 25,000-30,000 breeding pairs B1i
Glaucous Gull Larus hyperboreus LC winter 2000-2010 1,000-4,000 individuals B1i
Arctic Herring Gull Larus smithsonianus LC breeding 2009-2012 8,000-13,000 breeding pairs A4i, B1i, B3
Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica VU breeding 2012-2013 11,000-16,000 breeding pairs B1ii, B2
Common Murre Uria aalge LC breeding 2012-2013 14,000-15,000 breeding pairs B1ii
A4iii Species group - seabirds n/a breeding 2009-2013 58,000-74,000 breeding pairs A4iii
A4iii Species group - waterbirds n/a winter 2000-2013 16,000-29,000 individuals A4iii

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2014) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2014. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2015 unfavourable medium negligible
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
no habitat medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Steller's Eider Polysticta stelleri 3,000 2,000 individuals 67 unfavourable

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Marine Intertidal moderate (70-90%) moderate (70-90%) unfavourable
Grassland good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable
Marine Coastal/Supratidal good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable
Marine Neritic good (> 90%) good (> 90%) favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Energy production and mining likely in short term (within 4 years) some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Transportation and service corridors happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Biological resource use happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Natural system modifications happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happening now some of area/population (10-49%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Climate change and severe weather likely in long term (beyond 4 years) whole area/population (>90%) slow but significant deterioration medium
Residential and commercial development happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) slow but significant deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Little/none of site covered (<10%) No management planning has taken place Very little or no conservation action taking place negligible

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1967 Bigganjarga Naturminne <1
1983 Hornøya og Reinøya Naturreservat <1
1983 Ekkerøya Naturreservat <1
1991 Komagværstranda Naturreservat 1
1991 Varangerbotn Naturreservat <1
1991 Storelvosen Naturreservat <1
1991 Nesseby Naturreservat <1

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Grassland Tundra major (>10)
Marine Coastal/Supratidal major (>10)
Marine Intertidal major (>10)
Marine Neritic major (>10)
Wetlands (inland) Blanket bogs, Fens, transition mires and springs, Rivers and streams minor (<10)
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
fisheries/aquaculture major (>10)
rangeland/pastureland major (>10)
tourism/recreation major (>10)
agriculture minor (<10)
urban/industrial/transport minor (<10)
nature conservation and research -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Varangerfjord (including Hornøya and Reinøya) (Norway). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/varangerfjord-(including-hornøya-and-reinøya)-iba-norway on 22/11/2024.