The site was identified as important in 2012 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2012) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2012. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | not assessed | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
White-necked Petrel Pterodroma cervicalis | 16 | 16 | nests | 100 | not assessed |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Geological events | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Vanua Lava, Mount Sereama (Vanuatu). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/vanua-lava-mount-sereama-iba-vanuatu on 23/11/2024.