The site was identified as important in 2023 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yellow-legged Tinamou Crypturellus noctivagus | NT | resident | 2017 | min 30 individuals | B1a |
Moustached Woodcreeper Xiphocolaptes falcirostris | VU | resident | 2017-2022 | min 30 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2023) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2023. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | near favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Savanna | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1989 | Área De Proteção Ambiental Cavernas Do Peruaçu | Área de Proteção Ambiental | 56 |
1999 | Parque Nacional Cavernas Do Peruaçu | Parque | 87 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Tropical deciduous forest | major (>10) |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | major (>10) | |
Savanna | Cerrado | major (>10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Vale do Peruaçu (Brazil). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/vale-do-peruaçu-iba-brazil on 23/11/2024.