The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus | LC | breeding | 2000-2008 | 9-17 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax | LC | breeding | 2000-2008 | 137 breeding pairs | C6 |
Purple Heron Ardea purpurea | LC | breeding | 2004-2008 | 5 breeding pairs | C6 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | breeding | 2004-2008 | 145-460 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding | 2003-2008 | 25-70 breeding pairs | C6 |
Common Tern Sterna hirundo | LC | breeding | 2000-2008 | 95-380 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2005-2008 | 20,000-40,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | - |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1966 | Rotuz | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
1996 | Skarpa Wiślicka | Rezerwat Przyrody | <1 |
2003 | Pierściec | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 7 |
2003 | Cieszyńskie Źródła Tufowe | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
2007 | Dolina Górnej Wisły | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2008 | Zbiornik Goczałkowicki - Ujście Wisły i Bajerki | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 6 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Upper Vistula River Valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/upper-vistula-river-valley-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.