The site was identified as important in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pin-tailed Sandgrouse Pterocles alchata | LC | resident | 2002 | 3-6 breeding pairs | C6 |
Red-necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis | NT | breeding | 2002 | 10-100 breeding pairs | A3 |
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | LC | breeding | 2002 | 18-19 breeding pairs | A4i, B1i, B2, C6 |
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo | LC | resident | 2001 | 6-10 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black-winged Kite Elanus caeruleus | LC | resident | 2002 | 1-5 breeding pairs | C6 |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | EN | breeding | 2002 | 20-22 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Short-toed Snake-eagle Circaetus gallicus | LC | breeding | 2001 | 5-10 breeding pairs | C6 |
Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus | LC | resident | 1999 | 110-112 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 2002 | 1 breeding pairs | C6 |
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos | LC | resident | 2002 | 6-7 breeding pairs | C6 |
Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata | LC | resident | 2002 | 5-7 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus | LC | breeding | 2001 | 11-20 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Red Kite Milvus milvus | LC | breeding | 2001 | 1 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black Kite Milvus migrans | LC | breeding | 2001 | 6-10 breeding pairs | C6 |
Calandra Lark Melanocorypha calandra | LC | resident | 2002 | common | C6 |
Greater Short-toed Lark Calandrella brachydactyla | LC | resident | 2002 | frequent | C6 |
Spectacled Warbler Curruca conspicillata | LC | breeding | 2002 | rare | A3 |
Blue Rock-thrush Monticola solitarius | LC | resident | 2002 | 80-200 breeding pairs | B2 |
Black Wheatear Oenanthe leucura | LC | resident | 2001 | uncommon | A3, B2, C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2002) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2002. The most recent assessment (2005) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2005 | not assessed | low | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1999 | Tejo Internacional; Erges e PĂ´nsul | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 94 |
2000 | Tejo Internacional | Parque Natural | 77 |
2000 | Tejo Internacional | Natural Park | 65 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | Sclerophyllous scrub, garrigue and maquis | 55 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Perennial crops, orchards and groves, Forestry plantations | 15 |
Wetlands (inland) | Water fringe vegetation, Rivers and streams | 15 |
Forest | Broadleaved evergreen woodland | 10 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders, Inland cliffs | 5 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
hunting | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Upper River Tejo (Portugal). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/upper-river-tejo-iba-portugal on 22/11/2024.