PT013
Upper River Tejo


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Pin-tailed Sandgrouse Pterocles alchata LC resident (2002) 3–6 pairs C6
Red-necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis NT breeding (2002) 10–100 pairs A3
Black Stork Ciconia nigra LC breeding (2002) 18–19 pairs A4i, B1i, B2, C6
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo LC resident (2001) 6–10 pairs C6
Black-winged Kite Elanus caeruleus LC resident (2002) 1–5 pairs C6
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus EN breeding (2002) 20–22 pairs B2, C6
Short-toed Snake-eagle Circaetus gallicus LC breeding (2001) 5–10 pairs C6
Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus LC resident (1999) 110–112 pairs B2, C6
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus NT resident (2002) 1 pairs C6
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos LC resident (2002) 6–7 pairs C6
Bonelli's Eagle Aquila fasciata LC resident (2002) 5–7 pairs B2, C6
Booted Eagle Hieraaetus pennatus LC breeding (2001) 11–20 pairs B2, C6
Red Kite Milvus milvus LC breeding (2001) 1 pairs C6
Black Kite Milvus migrans LC breeding (2001) 6–10 pairs C6
Calandra Lark Melanocorypha calandra LC resident (2002) common C6
Greater Short-toed Lark Calandrella brachydactyla LC resident (2002) frequent C6
Spectacled Warbler Curruca conspicillata LC breeding (2002) rare A3
Blue Rock-thrush Monticola solitarius LC resident (2002) 80–200 pairs B2
Black Wheatear Oenanthe leucura LC resident (2001) uncommon A3, B2, C6

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2002. The most recent assessment (2005) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2005 not assessed low not assessed
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
no unset good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Not assessed Not assessed Not assessed not assessed

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
2000 Tejo Internacional Parque Natural (V) 77
2000 Tejo Internacional Natural Park (-) 65

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Shrubland 55 Sclerophyllous scrub, garrigue and maquis
Artificial/Terrestrial 15 Arable land; Perennial crops, orchards and groves; Forestry plantations
Wetlands (inland) 15 Water fringe vegetation; Rivers and streams
Forest 10 Broadleaved evergreen woodland
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) 5 Scree & boulders; Inland cliffs

Land use

Land use % of IBA
fisheries/aquaculture -
agriculture -
forestry -
hunting -
tourism/recreation -
nature conservation and research -
water management -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Upper River Tejo (Portugal). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/upper-river-tejo-iba-portugal on 22/12/2024.