The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2001) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2001. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Hartlaub's Duck Pteronetta hartlaubii | 30 | 30 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Psittacus erithacus | 300 | 300 | adults | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Upper Orashi River | Forest Reserve | 100 |
2008 | Upper Orashi Forests | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | 91 | |
Unknown | 5 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 2 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Upper Orashi forests (Nigeria). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/upper-orashi-forests-iba-nigeria on 24/11/2024.