The site was identified as important in 2015 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca | LC | non-breeding | 2010-2011 | 1,000-2,499 individuals | A4i |
South African Shelduck Tadorna cana | LC | non-breeding | 2010-2011 | 1,000-2,499 individuals | A4i |
Yellow-billed Duck Anas undulata | LC | non-breeding | 2010-2011 | 1,000-2,499 individuals | A4i |
Blue Crane Anthropoides paradiseus | VU | non-breeding | 2010-2014 | 100-300 individuals | A1 |
Ludwig's Bustard Neotis ludwigii | EN | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A1, A3 |
Karoo Bustard Heterotetrax vigorsii | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
Blue Bustard Eupodotis caerulescens | NT | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A1 |
Secretarybird Sagittarius serpentarius | EN | resident | 2010-2014 | 1 breeding pairs | A1 |
Melodious Lark Mirafra cheniana | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A1 |
Namaqua Warbler Phragmacia substriata | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
Layard's Warbler Curruca layardi | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
Pale-winged Starling Onychognathus nabouroup | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
Karoo Chat Emarginata schlegelii | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
Sickle-winged Chat Emarginata sinuata | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
Black-headed Canary Serinus alario | LC | resident | 2010-2014 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2015) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2015. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | poor (40-69%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1972 | Tussen-die-Riviere Game Farm | Nature Reserve | 22 |
1979 | Gariep Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | 32 |
1981 | Oviston Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | 36 |
2001 | Letsatsi Private Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | Other artificial wetlands | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers & streams | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Upper Orange River (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/upper-orange-river-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.