The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | breeding | 2009 | 3-6 breeding pairs | C6 |
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2004-2009 | 200-300 males | C1, C6 |
Little Crake Zapornia parva | LC | breeding | 2009 | 30-50 males | C6 |
Common Little Bittern Ixobrychus minutus | LC | breeding | 2004-2009 | 10-15 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding | 2004-2009 | 60-100 breeding pairs | C6 |
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus | LC | breeding | 2004-2009 | 1-2 breeding pairs | C6 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2004-2009 | 20,000 individuals | C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | near favourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | 2 | 4 | breeding pairs | 100 | not assessed |
Corncrake Crex crex | 50 | 300 | males | 100 | favourable |
Little Crake Zapornia parva | 60 | 50 | males | 84 | near favourable |
Ixobrychus minutus | 20 | 15 | breeding pairs | 75 | near favourable |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | 140 | 140 | breeding pairs | 100 | not assessed |
Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus | 2 | 2 | breeding pairs | 100 | not assessed |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
No known threats | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2007 | Dolina Tyśmienicy | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 93 |
2008 | Ostoja Parczewska | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 3 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Humid grasslands, Mesophile grasslands | 76 |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Water fringe vegetation, Fens, transition mires and springs | 15 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Highly improved re-seeded landscapes, Arable land | 6 |
Forest | Native coniferous woodland, Mixed woodland, Alluvial and very wet forest | 3 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 85 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 10 |
forestry | 5 |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tysmienica river valley (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tysmienica-river-valley-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.