The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | passage | 1998 | 1-2,000 individuals | A1 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | passage | 1998 | 10-65 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | passage | 1998 | 390-1,300 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | winter | 1998 | 150-1,900 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | very unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing brackish and salt water | 67 |
Desert | Semidesert | 10 |
Forest | Mixed woodland | 7 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 100 |
tourism/recreation | 80 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Turalinskaya lagoon (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/turalinskaya-lagoon-iba-russia-(european) on 23/11/2024.