The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | passage | 2005 | 50-100 individuals | A1 |
Northern Pintail Anas acuta | LC | passage | 1973-1974 | 20,000-50,000 individuals | A4i |
Yellow-eyed Pigeon Columba eversmanni | VU | breeding | 2005 | 2-20 breeding pairs | A1 |
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | passage | 2003 | 40,000-70,000 individuals | A4i |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | passage | 1976 | 10-60 individuals | A1 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | passage | - | 2-10 individuals | A1 |
Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus | NT | passage | 1972-1974 | 50-100 individuals | A1 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2005 | 100-200 breeding pairs | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | passage | 1975 | 100-400 individuals | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | passage | - | 5-15 individuals | A1 |
A4iv Species group - soaring birds/cranes | n/a | passage | 2003 | 45,000-85,000 individuals | A4iv |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 1973-1974 | 20,000-50,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | not assessed | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | Unknown | Unknown | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Perennial crops, orchards & groves, Ruderal land | 15 |
Grassland | Steppes & dry calcareous | 5 |
Wetlands (inland) | Fens, transition mires & springs, Rivers & streams, Standing fresh water, Water-fringe vegetation | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 80 |
water management | 80 |
hunting | 50 |
forestry | 5 |
urban/industrial/transport | 5 |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tulek Valley (Kyrgyzstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tulek-valley-iba-kyrgyzstan on 23/11/2024.