The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chestnut Teal Anas castanea | LC | resident | 1991-2005 | 176-2,573 individuals | A4i |
Sharp-tailed Sandpiper Calidris acuminata | VU | non-breeding | 1989-2005 | 52-4,708 individuals | A4i |
Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor | CR | non-breeding | 2002-2005 | 40-650 individuals | A1 |
Regent Honeyeater Anthochaera phrygia | CR | non-breeding | 2002-2005 | 3-72 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | very unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2005 | Wyrrabalong | National Park | 3 |
2007 | Tuggerah | Nature Reserve | 1 |
2007 | Colongra Swamp | Nature Reserve | 1 |
2015 | Munmorah | State Conservation Area | 12 |
2015 | Tuggerah | State Conservation Area | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Improved grassland & pasture | minor (<10) |
Forest | Casuarina forests & woodlands, Eucalypt open forests, Eucalypt woodlands, Melaleuca forests & woodlands | minor (<10) |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) | |
Shrubland | Heath | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
tourism/recreation | major (>10) |
urban/industrial/transport | major (>10) |
forestry | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tuggerah (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tuggerah-iba-australia on 23/11/2024.