The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | unfavourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Shrubland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1948 | Tsavo East | National Park | 100 |
1976 | Ngai Ndethya | National Reserve | <1 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Local conservancies | 0 |
Taita Ranches | 0 |
Taita Wildlife Forum | 0 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 86 | |
Shrubland | 7 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 4 | |
Forest | 2 | |
Savanna | Bushland & thicket - evergreen, Wooded grassland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
tourism/recreation | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tsavo East National Park (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tsavo-east-national-park-iba-kenya on 22/11/2024.