The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus | LC | resident | 2006-2007 | 50 breeding pairs | A2, A3 |
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 2006-2007 | 50-100 breeding pairs | A1, A2, A3 |
Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus | NT | breeding | 2006-2007 | 2-5 breeding pairs | B2 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | resident | 2006-2007 | 100 breeding pairs | A3 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | breeding | 2006-2007 | 5-10 breeding pairs | A3 |
Great Rosefinch Carpodacus rubicilla | LC | resident | 2006-2007 | 1 breeding pairs | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1986 | Tlyaratinsky | Zakaznik (Federal) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland | 60 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders | 15 |
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Mixed woodland, Native coniferous woodland | 10 |
Shrubland | 10 | |
Other | 5 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas, Urban parks and gardens | 3 |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams, Standing freshwater | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
rangeland/pastureland | 50 |
forestry | 15 |
agriculture | 2 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tlyaratinski reserve (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tlyaratinski-reserve-iba-russia-(european) on 22/11/2024.