The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nicobar Scrubfowl Megapodius nicobariensis | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Andaman Woodpigeon Columba palumboides | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Cuckoo-Dove Macropygia rufipennis | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Andaman Boobook Ninox affinis | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
Nicobar Sparrowhawk Accipiter butleri | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
Nicobar Bulbul Ixos nicobariensis | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2 |
White-headed Starling Sturnia erythropygia | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | near favourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | unknown |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Nicobar Scrubfowl Megapodius nicobariensis | 1,200 | 64 | individuals | 6 | not assessed |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Unknown | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1977 | Tillongchang Island | Sanctuary | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Forest | - | |
Grassland | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tillangchong, Camorta, Katchal, Nancowry and Trinkat (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tillangchong-camorta-katchal-nancowry-and-trinkat-iba-india on 22/11/2024.