The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Black-tailed Gull Larus crassirostris | LC | resident (2003) | present | A4i |
Slaty-backed Gull Larus schistisagus | LC | resident (2003) | present | A4i |
Rhinoceros Auklet Cerorhinca monocerata | LC | breeding (2003) | present | A4ii |
A4iii Species group - seabirds | n/a | breeding (2003) | min 10,000 pairs | A4iii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | not assessed | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | - |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (>4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | Unknown | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1976 | Teuri yagishiri | 沿岸水産資源開発区域 (VI) | 2 |
1982 | Teurito | 国指定鳥獣保護区 (IV) | 100 |
1990 | Shokanbetsu-Teuri-Yagishiri | 国定公園 (V) | 100 |
2013 | Common fishery right area(Hokkaido) | 共同漁業権区域 (VI) | 2 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Teuri island (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/teuri-island-iba-japan on 23/12/2024.