The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-footed Booby Sula sula | LC | breeding | 1972-1973 | 1,000-5,000 breeding pairs | A4ii |
Brown Noddy Anous stolidus | LC | breeding | 2009 | 10,552 breeding pairs | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | breeding | 2009 | 10,552 breeding pairs | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2012) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2012 | very unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Red-footed Booby Sula sula | 5,000 | 70 | breeding pairs | 2 | very unfavourable |
Brown Noddy Anous stolidus | 30,000 | 10,552 | breeding pairs | 36 | very unfavourable |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | 30,000 | 10,552 | breeding pairs | 36 | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Coconut plantations | - |
Forest | Dry deciduous forest (tropical) | - |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Shrubland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tetiaroa (French Polynesia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tetiaroa-iba-french-polynesia on 23/11/2024.