The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | winter (1993) | 14,700 birds | A4i, B1i |
Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus | LC | non-breeding (-) | 4,000–24,000 birds | A4i, B1i |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | breeding (-) | 2 pairs | B1i |
Greater Sandplover Charadrius leschenaultii | LC | breeding (-) | 30–40 pairs | B1i, B2 |
Slender-billed Gull Larus genei | LC | non-breeding (1998–1999) | 1,800 birds | B1i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | winter (1993) | 20,841 birds | A4iii |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | very poor | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70–90%) | poor (40–69%) | very poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1992 | Tersakan Golu | SIT (Law on Protection of Cultural and Natural Assets No. 2863) (-) | 56 |
2002 | Tuz Golu OCKB | Specially Protected Area of Marine Importance (Barcelona Convention) (-) | 100 |
2010 | Tersakan Lake | Wetland of Local Importance (-) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 49 | Standing brackish and salt water |
Desert | 37 | |
Other | 14 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 80 |
urban/industrial/transport | 25 |
hunting | 10 |
agriculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tersakan Lake (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tersakan-lake-iba-türkiye on 23/12/2024.