The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red-breasted Goose Branta ruficollis | VU | winter | 1995 | 90 individuals | A1, B2 |
Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca | NT | breeding | 2000 | 20 breeding pairs | A1 |
Black Stork Ciconia nigra | LC | breeding | - | 5-10 breeding pairs | B2 |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | passage | 2000 | 32 individuals | A1 |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | winter | 2002 | 224 individuals | A1 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | breeding | 2000 | 45 breeding pairs | B2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | unfavourable | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Istanbul Catalca Cilingoz YHGS | Wildlife Development Area | 100 |
1987 | Kırklareli Kasatura Basin | Nature Protect Area | 100 |
2010 | Terkos Lake | Wetland of Local Importance | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Shrubland | Heathland, Sclerophyllous scrub, garrigue and maquis | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Terkos Basin (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/terkos-basin-iba-türkiye on 23/11/2024.