The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | breeding | 2004 | < 50 breeding pairs | A3 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | breeding | 2004 | < 50 individuals | A3 |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | breeding | 2003 | 20-40 breeding pairs | A1 |
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus | LC | breeding | 2000-2003 | 150-320 individuals | A4i |
Black-winged Pratincole Glareola nordmanni | NT | breeding | 1998-2004 | 40-50 individuals | A1, A3 |
Pallas's Gull Larus ichthyaetus | LC | breeding | 2007 | < 50 breeding pairs | A3 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | breeding | 2007 | < 50 individuals | A3 |
Pallid Harrier Circus macrourus | NT | breeding | 2004 | 12-14 breeding pairs | A1, A3 |
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus | VU | breeding | 2000-2004 | < 50 breeding pairs | A3 |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2007 | 20,000-49,999 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | unfavourable | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Grassland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing fresh water, Temporary water bodies, Water-fringe vegetation | 80 |
Grassland | Humid, Mesophile grassland & tall grass steppe, Steppes & dry calcareous | 15 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Highly improved reseeded grasslands, Other urban & industrial areas | 5 |
Forest | Wooded steppe | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 100 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 40 |
rangeland/pastureland | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Teniz-Karakamys Lakes (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/teniz-karakamys-lakes-iba-kazakhstan on 23/11/2024.