The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | passage | 2005-2006 | 11,260-27,000 individuals | A4i |
A4iii Species group - waterbirds | n/a | passage | 2005 | 20,000 individuals | A4iii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | near favourable | low | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Desert | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Wetlands (inland) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 50 | |
Desert | 25 | |
Grassland | 25 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 50 |
rangeland/pastureland | 30 |
not utilised | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Teke Lake (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/teke-lake-iba-kazakhstan on 23/11/2024.