The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Taveuni | Forest Reserve | 39 |
- | Lavena Coastal Walk | Recreational Reserve | - |
1959 | Ravilevu | Nature Reserve | 14 |
1990 | Bouma Lavena | Recreational Reserve | 52 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Taveuni Highlands (Fiji). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/taveuni-highlands-iba-fiji on 22/11/2024.