The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | passage | 2000 | 1,000-5,000 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | favourable | medium | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Buteo rufinus | 2 | 2 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Egyptian Vulture Neophron percnopterus | 3 | 3 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland | 60 |
Grassland | Steppes and dry calcareous grassland, Humid grasslands | 27 |
Shrubland | Scrub | 7 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Other urban and industrial areas | 5 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 5 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
hunting | 85 |
forestry | 60 |
tourism/recreation | 50 |
rangeland/pastureland | 25 |
agriculture | 5 |
urban/industrial/transport | 5 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Talginskaya Valley (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/talginskaya-valley-iba-russia-(european) on 23/11/2024.