KE021
Taita Hills Forests This is an IBA in Danger! 


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Southern Banded Snake-eagle Circaetus fasciolatus NT resident (1999) present A1
Taita Falcon Falco fasciinucha VU resident (-) present A1
Taita Apalis Apalis fuscigularis CR resident (1999) present A1, A2
Taita White-eye Zosterops silvanus VU resident (1998) 1,500 birds A1, A2
Abbott's Starling Arizelopsar femoralis EN resident (1999) present A1
Taita Thrush Turdus helleri EN resident (1999) present A1, A2

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2023 poor high high
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat good

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Forest moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Natural system modifications happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Biological resource use happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) low
Pollution happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) A compre­hensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species The conservation measures needed for the site are being compre­hensively and effectively implemented high

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
- Kichuchenyi Forest Reserve (-) <1
- Mbololo Nature Reserve (IV) -
- Ngerenyi Forest Reserve (-) <1
- Yale Forest Reserve (-) <1
- Sagalla Forest Reserve (-) <1
- Ngangao Forest Reserve (-) <1
- Chaiwa Forest Reserve (-) <1
- Vurai Forest Reserve (-) <1
1991 Mwachora Forest Reserve (-) <1
1991 Macha Forest Reserve (-) <1
1991 Fururu Forest Reserve (-) <1

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Artificial/Terrestrial - Forestry & agro-industrial plantations
Forest - Mid-altitude forest - transitional

Land use

Land use % of IBA
agriculture -
forestry -
nature conservation and research -
urban/industrial/transport -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Taita Hills Forests (Kenya). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/taita-hills-forests-iba-kenya on 23/12/2024.