The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Spotted Crake Porzana porzana | LC | breeding (1995–2003) | 6–35 males | C6 |
Little Crake Zapornia parva | LC | breeding (1990–1998) | 50–60 males | C6 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage (2009) | 1,500 birds | C2 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding (1998) | 80 pairs | C6 |
Bluethroat Luscinia svecica | LC | breeding (1995–2003) | 6–28 pairs | C6 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | not assessed | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | medium |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in short term (<4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | high |
No known threats | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Not assessed | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1963 | Świdwie | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | 13 |
1963 | Jezioro S/widwie NR (Bird Reserve) | Nature Reserve (-) | - |
1963 | Jezioro Swidwie | Nature Reserve (IV) | 5 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | 51 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 22 | |
Grassland | 16 | Humid grasslands |
Wetlands (inland) | 10 | Standing freshwater; Water fringe vegetation; Fens, transition mires and springs |
Other | 1 | |
Shrubland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 100 |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Swidwie Site (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/swidwie-site-iba-poland on 23/12/2024.