The site was identified as important in 2000 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris | LC | breeding | 1996 | 200-300 breeding pairs | B2 |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | LC | breeding | 1996 | 400-500 breeding pairs | B2 |
Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola | VU | breeding | 1996 | 500-1,000 breeding pairs | A1, B2 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2000) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2000. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | unfavourable | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Eurasian Bittern Botaurus stellaris | 15 | 75 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
White-winged Tern Chlidonias leucopterus | 500 | 250 | breeding pairs | 50 | unfavourable |
Black Tern Chlidonias niger | 50 | 200 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Western Marsh-harrier Circus aeruginosus | 60 | 110 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Circus cyaneus | 3 | 2 | breeding pairs | 67 | unfavourable |
Aquatic Warbler Acrocephalus paludicola | 85 | 150 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Supoy Marsh | Zakaznik | 3 |
1979 | Svidovets'kiy | Regional Zakaznik | 13 |
1979 | Boloto Supiy | Regional Zakaznik | 3 |
1994 | Usivs'kiy - 2 | State Zakaznik | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation, Fens, transition mires and springs | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 90 |
fisheries/aquaculture | 5 |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Supij marsh (Ukraine). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/supij-marsh-iba-ukraine on 23/11/2024.