• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2003 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Sarus Crane Grus antigone	VU	non-breeding	2001	rare	A1
Bengal Florican Houbaropsis bengalensis	CR	resident	2001	rare	A1, A3
Greater Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius	NT	non-breeding	2001	rare	A1, A4i
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus	NT	non-breeding	2001	common	A1
Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea	EN	non-breeding	2001	rare	A1
Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans	LC	non-breeding	2001	common	A4i
White-shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni	CR	non-breeding	2001	rare	A1
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis	NT	non-breeding	2001	abundant	A1
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga	VU	non-breeding	2001	rare	A1
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca	VU	non-breeding	2001	rare	A1
White-browed Reed-warbler Acrocephalus tangorum	VU	winter	2001	present	A1
Plain-backed Sparrow Passer flaveolus	LC	resident	2001	common	A3

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2003) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2003. The most recent assessment (2009) is shown below.

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat	Quantity (% remaining)	Quality (% carrying capacity)	Result
Grassland	poor (40-69%)	good (> 90%)	unfavourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Biological resource use	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species)	No management planning has taken place	Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity	low

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Artificial/Terrestrial	Rice paddies, Perennial crops, orchards and groves, Small settlements, rural gardens	-
Grassland	Edaphic grassland, Secondary grassland	-
Shrubland	Secondary scrub	-
Wetlands (inland)	Freshwater lakes and pools, Ephemeral wetlands, Rivers and streams, Permanent swamps	-

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use	% of IBA
agriculture	-
fisheries/aquaculture	-
nature conservation and research	-
other	-

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Stung Sen / Santuk / Baray (Cambodia). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/stung-sen--santuk--baray-iba-cambodia on 22/11/2024.