The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus | EN | resident (2004) | present | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | unfavourable | high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the key species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Residential and commercial development | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1981 | Khuen Si Nakarin | National Park (II) | 100 |
2009 | Khlong Lamngu | National Park (II) | 2 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | 100 | Dry deciduous forest (tropical) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sri Nakarin (Thailand). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sri-nakarin-iba-thailand on 07/01/2025.