The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2003 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | VU | non-breeding (2002) | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | non-breeding (2002) | rare | A1 |
Milky Stork Mycteria cinerea | EN | non-breeding (2002) | rare | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2003. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | population | medium |
State (condition of the key species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Siamese Crocodile Crocodylus siamensis | 3 / 3 (individuals) | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented, but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1993 | Dong Peng | Multiple Use Management Area (VI) | 89 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | Peat swamp forest (tropical); Mangrove forest (tropical) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | Rice paddies; Perennial crops, orchards and groves; Small settlements, rural gardens; Abandoned farmland, disturbed ground |
Grassland | minor (<10) | Edaphic grassland |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sre Ambel (Cambodia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sre-ambel-iba-cambodia on 15/01/2025.