The site was identified as important in 2016 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis | VU | winter | 2005-2016 | 7,500-160,000 individuals | A1, A4i, B1i, B2, C1, C2 |
Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle | LC | winter | 1993 | 770 individuals | B1ii |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2016) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2016. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | very unfavourable | high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Long-tailed Duck Clangula hyemalis | 1,060,000 | 206,000 | individuals | 20 | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Unknown | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2002 | Norra Midsjöbanken | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2016 | Hoburgs bank och Midsjöbankarna | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 30 |
2017 | Hoburgs bank och Midsjöbankarna | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 30 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Neritic | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Southern Midsjö Bank (Sweden). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/southern-midsjö-bank-iba-sweden on 23/11/2024.