The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demoiselle Crane Anthropoides virgo | LC | breeding | 2002 | present | A3 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | breeding | 2006-2007 | 200-400 breeding pairs | A1, A3 |
Great Bustard Otis tarda | EN | breeding | 2002 | present | A3 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | breeding | 2006-2007 | 11-15 breeding pairs | A1, A3 |
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus | VU | breeding | 2002-2007 | 100 breeding pairs | A1, A3 |
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus | VU | passage | 2002 | 150 individuals | A1 |
Red-footed Falcon Falco vespertinus | VU | passage | 2006-2007 | 1,000 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1920 | Ilmensky/Ilmensky (filial Arkaim)/Ilmensky (osnovnaya territoriya) | Zapovednik | 2 |
1920 | Ilmensky/Ilmensky (filial Arkaim)/Ilmensky (osnovnaya territoriya) | Zapovednik | 2 |
1991 | Ilmensky (filial Arkaim) | Zapovednik | 2 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 60 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 30 | |
Forest | 15 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 4 | |
Shrubland | 3 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 60 |
forestry | 15 |
other | 10 |
urban/industrial/transport | 3 |
tourism/recreation | 2 |
nature conservation and research | 2 |
military | minor (<10) |
hunting | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sources of the Bolshaya Karaganka and Syntasty rivers (Russia (Central Asian)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sources-of-the-bolshaya-karaganka-and-syntasty-rivers-iba-russia-(central-asian) on 23/11/2024.