The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 2007 | 100-150 males | A1, A2, A3 |
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 2007 | 30-50 males | A1 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 2007 | 1-2 breeding pairs | B2 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | breeding | 2007 | 10-15 breeding pairs | A3 |
Krueper's Nuthatch Sitta krueperi | LC | resident | 2007 | 200-250 breeding pairs | A1 |
Wallcreeper Tichodroma muraria | LC | breeding | 2007 | 1-2 breeding pairs | A3 |
Semi-collared Flycatcher Ficedula semitorquata | LC | breeding | 2007 | 20-30 breeding pairs | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | favourable | low | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | 100 | 100 | males | 100 | favourable |
Bearded Vulture Gypaetus barbatus | 1 | 1 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Turinyi | Zakaznik | 93 |
1924 | Kavkazsky | Zapovednik | 3 |
1978 | Kavkazskiy | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 3 |
1993 | Dahovskiy | Zakaznik | 83 |
1999 | Western Caucasus | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 52 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland | 100 |
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland | 20 |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Inland cliffs | 8 |
Shrubland | 3 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 1 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | 25 |
agriculture | 20 |
forestry | 20 |
tourism/recreation | 10 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Sources of Kuna and Shisha rivers (Russia (European)). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/sources-of-kuna-and-shisha-rivers-iba-russia-(european) on 22/11/2024.